Revisions

Carr Response Paper

            An avid writer and a well accomplished one at that; Nicholas Carr is known for discussing technology and its affects as well as the extent that the Internet is changing our thoughts. Carr has written numerous books on this subject and has an extensive career in writing. Some of his works include being a columnist of the Guardian in London, and published works in Atlantic, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, Wired, the New Republic, MIT Technology Review, and Nature. In the article he published, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, Carr examines the use of the Internet and how he himself is noticing changes within his own mind. Despite the fact that, “The Web has been a godsend [to me] as a writer”, Carr also finds that, “…the Net seems to be chipping away my capacity for concentration and contemplation.” The overall argument presented throughout the paper by Carr is that the Internet and online reading, blogging, surfing and searching are far less thought provoking than reading from a book. He presents the idea, “What is the Internet doing to our brains?” The Internet is causing us to become distracted, or as Carr states we can find ourselves “drifting” from long texts. In turn this phenomenon is making us as a people, “stupid”, a distinct word Carr uses in the title of the article. In this paper, I will discuss the strengths of Carr’s arguments as well as the weaknesses through analyzation of persuasive techniques he uses known as the Aristotelian Appeals of logos, pathos, and ethos.

            Carr starts his article through utilizing a theater example from the movie 2001:A Space Odyssey that sets a chilling scene for the remainder of his article.  The computer known as Hal in the movie is stating, “Dave my mind is going, I can feel it. I can feel it”, as Dave, an astronaut, is shutting down the computers system. An emotional appeal to some readers in the audience, despite the fact that Hal is a computer , we feel his childlike pleading as if he were human. Carr uses this to lead into what his argument regarding the Internet stands at. Carr reports that, “he can feel it too. Over the past few years I’ve [Carr] had an uncomfortable sense that someone, or something, has been tinkering with my brain, remapping the neural circuitry, reprogramming the memory”. Much like that of Hal in the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey, his mind is changing.  Right off the bat Carr is connecting to the readers at an emotional level through the tone of this chilling scene at the end of 2001. This is a very persuasive technique that Carr utilizes and he again comes back to the idea towards the end of the article as well. One of the last things that Carr addresses in this article is, “I’m haunted by that scene in 2001. What makes it so poignant, and so weird, is the computers emotional response to the disassembly of its mind: its despair as one circuit after another goes dark, its childlike pleading with the astronaut-…can only be called a state of innocence.” Carr is able to go full circle with this same idea and it provides familiarity for the readers and a place of connection as well.

Carr’s main argument is only introduced through the scene of 2001: A Space Odyssey.  Carr goes onto to explain that he is not the only one experiencing this kind of feeling; to establish credibility or ethos he tells us what his friends are discovering as well. Most are literary types, that claim, “the more they use the Web, the more they have to fight to stay focused on long pieces of writing”, now Carr states just after that, “anecdotes alone don’t prove much”.  That small piece of acknowledgement contributes to the audience seeing him as trustworthy because he does point out that no, we cant justifiably draw conclusions just from something a few people “claim” they are experiencing. We still need the “the long term neurological and psychological experiments that will provide a definitive picture of how Internet use affects cognition”. Additionally throughout the article Carr’s ability to incorporate many professional opinions and be knowledgeable about them also contribute to the overall credibility of him as a writer. This is a very important and powerful tool that he applies.